|
|
I'll think carefully next time I decide to
post anything overly political on the site. I've received shall
we say a few emails from people wanting to have their say on the
United States, Iraq and especially George Bush. Here's a couple
of them...
Dan
wrote:
Subject: Bush
Mr Bush is not an idiot, as has sometimes
been depicted on your site. No indeed, he’s an emotional
infant, showered in the power of the most powerful office
in the world; who wants to make a name for himself in the
history books as being some great leader who ‘rid
the world of evil’; who is consequently less in support
of the American way of life and freedom as he is in ego
driven insane venues.
You want specifics? Just to
name a few, check out what this administration has done to
‘FICA’, our Freedom of Information Act through
which we as a people are given the legal right to know what
really goes on in our countries administration. It is being
systematically disassembled by the Bush administration, using
9/11 as an excuse. An even better example is the ‘Patriot
Act’ and the new “Domestic Security Enhancement
Act of 2003”. (http://www.publicintegrity.org/dtaweb/home.asp)
“The civil liberties of ordinary Americans have taken
a tremendous blow with this law.” http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/Terrorism_militias/20011031_eff_usa_patriot_analysis.html
With Bush at the helm, this
administration is doing in record time, what no terrorist
organization could.
There is a far greater saga
than "The American Way of Life vs. Terrorism". It
is “The American way of life vs. Bush’s emotional
survival and ego driven accomplishments” and the American
way of life is losing big time.
Many people in this country
are apathetic and disbelieving that something like this could
happen. We take our freedoms for granted. (and we have a few
spoon feed morons like that guy Roger, the vet from the states,
who wrote you complaining about you picking on our Bush and
not the others)
I guess it’s inevitable
that you do not value what you have until you lose it. Perhaps
then more of us will sit up and take notice.
|
Hector Ubaldo Duarte
wrote:
Subject: USA BASHING: FUCK YOU
Dear ORSM: Great site, keep it up!
Kindly ask you not to post my e-mail address as it is not even
mine but my sister's. The
world these days seems to be very much against the US, President
Bush and the forthcoming war on Iraq. I am not going to go
into a discussion here because, simply, I think everyone who
is against the war is an idiot. What I'm gonna do is give
you some case scenarios and let you Aussies make up your own
mind about whose side you wanna be on: America's or, let's
say, France.
1. The USA is not talking about
invading, say, Norway, and removing their political and military
leadership from power. Reason is Norway has never initiated
wars of aggression against its neighbors (at least not since
the vikings were having fun in the area), Norway's government
has never gassed it's own people and it's not hellbent on
acquiring nuclear weapons so it can threaten those damned
Swedish with impunity. Instead we're talking about removing
one of the worst despots this planets has ever known. I'm
guessing you want murderers and rapists and arsonists off
your streets. Why would you be against removing this kind
of scum from the world stage?
2. To the Aussies: In WWII your
country was next on the Japanese hit list. Who came to help?
The USA. To the French: KISS MY AMERICAN ASS!! If it wasn't
for our American GIs you (in the immortal words of Groundskeeper
Willie) "cheese eating surrendering monkeys" would
be speaking German with a French accent. To the Germans: if
the USA hadn't protected your kraut asses from the rightful
ire of the victors right after that little skirmish you started
(historically known as WWII) ended your country wouldn't even
exist as it would have been divided between those same victorious
countries. To the Luxembourghish (my country of residence
by the way): go read the plaque on Place d'Armes thanking
the Americans for liberating your country from the Germans.
Go visit the American soldier's cemetery and count the white
crosses there. Those are Americans who died so you could be
free.
3. To Tony Blair: you sir are
an example the world should follow. Your political afiliation
is opposite that of George bush. your party is giving you
hell for your pro-American stance. But you take to heart the
words of William Shakespeare: "... if the cause is just
and honorable....". Whereever I am, when I meet a pro-American
British, I will buy that person a beer and dedicate it to
your whole country.
4. After the Bali bombing, where
many Aussies died, if Australia had asked for help from the
USA to "hunt down those responsible and kill them like
insects....", is there any doubt America would have been
there for you, no questions asked? Your government is right
in standing with us. We, together, the USA, Australia, Spain,
Italy, GB, and many, many other countries are doing THE RIGHT
THING in getting rid of Hussein and his pals. Too bad we can't
get rid of all assholes like him all over the world.
5. We are at war ladies and
gentlemen. A war of psychopaths against society, of Islam
against the west, a war of cultures. There are many things
I dislike about America (our domestic cars {if we can call
them that} for instance) but there should be no question that
the USA stands with her friends in "just and honorable
causes". We expect reciprocity.
And finally this is as good
a time as any in history to find out the truth. Are you our
friends or just paying lip service to us? If you are our friends
you will find out that there's no truer or more loyal friend
than the USA. We will give our lives for our friends like
we have done in the past. If a friend of my country, Britain,
Australia, etc. is attacked by a hostile nation, this American
will pick up a rifle and go fight with you, for your land,
side by side.
If you're just pissed at us
because we are powerful and you're not (like France and Germany)
then, with all due respect, FUCK YOU VERY MUCH!! Take your
best shot. The Arabs hate the USA, the communists hate the
USA, the French hate the USA, the Germans hate the USA....
The question is, what are they going to do about it? We are
the good guys whether you like it or not. Stand with us and
be the good guys to.... or go join the French. |
sam jensen
wrote:
Subject: (no subject)
first of all, id like to say thankyou
for taking the time to create, and maintain an orsm website.
you provide me, and my time-wasting contempories a plethore
of fodder for our entertainment, and you do it well.
but, im writing in response to your opinion on iraq, etc.,
where you likened the situation to you distrusting your
neighbor, and taking him out because you'd "run out
of patience".
using you allusion for a moment, you wouldnt have to worry
about messrs johnson and patel, as they'd be in jail now
for murder, and probably drug traffiking (biological and
chemical weaponry)
iraq has used chemical weapons in the past (during the last
gulf war), so it is entirely reasonable to suspect that
they have continued the practice since then. time and again
they have been untruthful and unhelpful to un inspectors.
given this i also think it is reasonalble for president
bush et al to say the have lost patience.
to say that the iraqi government is a despotic regime is
an understatement. many are vic timised, the people do not
get the same freedom of speech that you and i enjoy, and
are caught in the middle of a dreadly situation because
of their "leaders" grandiose aspirations.
the un is completely inept at resoling situations like this.
this has been seen in rwanda, bosnia, east timor etc. however,
something needs to be done. iraq has shown its reluctance
to comply with the un's requests for a peaceful resolution,
i.e.: to not only stop prodcing chemical and biological
weaponry, but also to prove it.
saddam hussein and his "government" (read: extended
family and friends) need to be removed. unfortunately, it
seems that conflict is the only way that this is going to
achieved.
aside from disagreeing with you, i quite liked your article
and the way you expressed your view. please keep updating,
sam.
|
Mike
wrote:
Subject: BUSH Comments
First off, I want to say you run an awesome
site that is easily one of my favorites on the web. I saw
something published last update that I would like to address.
If you post this response, please don't put my email address
because I don't need a bunch of bullshit emails from these
fucking Bush fans. Just Mike is fine.
This is in response to Roger,
the man who complained that you do not make fun of political
leaders other than Bush. Roger favors Bush over Gore because
he claims that the Dems are trying to take away our civil
rights. Personally, I'm not a big fan of Republicans or Democrats
in America, but let's just take a look at the rights Bush
has taken away. On October 25, 2001, Bush signed the "USA
PATRIOT Act" which basically revoked half of the ten
amendments in the Bill of Rights. The law cancelled habeas
corpus rights for noncitizens (approximately 20 million people
in USA), it alloed government officials to search property
without the owner being present (i.e. baggage searches in
airports), and it expanded governments ability to wiretap
phone and internet (i.e. email and bank records). It also
allowed government agents to seize public library records,
monitor conversations between criminals and their lawyers,
and otherwise outright spy on American citizens. Bush also
declared that a noncitizen he considered a terrorist could
be tried by a military tribunal (operated in secret), that
could impose the death penalty and would not be subject to
judicial appeal.
Roger, I hope your "renewed
sense of comfort" in this administration will still comfort
you if the authorities come knocking. In that one bill, the
first, fourth, fifth, sixth, and eighth amendments were revoked.
I'm sure you can see how hypocritical you sound when you say
"Our previous leader was fast on the road to taking many
of our basic freedoms," and then you support Bush's administration
after the PATRIOT Act.
Keep up the good work ORSM.
Most of us YANKEES love ALL of your material!! |
K9y9y9
wrote:
Subject: re:FROM TERRY JONES (MONTY PYTHON)...
Mr. Orsm,I am curious as to why the article
entitled, "FROM TERRY JONES (MONTY PYTHON) IN THE OBSERVER
LATE LAST MONTH" was posted on your web site. I could
not tell if it was supposed to be a joke or a political
statement or some of both. Either way I can't see why you
would want to publish it, being as the comparisons it makes
are nothing more than poor at best.
First I would like to point
out that if one would like to compare Mr. Johnson and Mr.
Patel to Saddam Hussein one would have to say that "it
is an undeniable fact that several years ago Mr. Johnson and
Mr. Patel invaded a neighbors home(Kuwait) trying to take
it from its rightful owners and in the process killing some
of the occupants." And, "After the strongest neighbor
on the block(U.S.A.) went in to that neighbors home and expelled
Mr. Johnson and Mr. Patel, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Patel killed
some members of there own households because those members
no longer wished for Mr. Johnson and Mr. Patel to be the heads
of those households." Both of these events in real life
would have caused the police to arrest Mr. Johnson and Mr.
Patel. To end the story, you would not have to worry about
them because they would be in jail.
Secondly, Mr. Terry Jones seems
to believe that the United Nations is comparable to the police.
The U.N. is not comparable to the police. The world has no
police and more importantly there is NO INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Therefore, in theory, the leaders of each country in this
world has equal authority, and there is no higher authority
in each country than its leaders. The average citizen basically
has no authority. The local police and leaders have authority
over the average citizen. The state police and leaders have
authority over local police and leaders. Federal police and
leaders have authority over state police and leaders. It is
not true that what the leaders of a state or country are legally
permitted to do is also legally permissible for a citizen.
Thirdly, Mr. Terry Jones implies
that he has access to all of the classified documents, videos,
audio tapes, pictures, and other surveillance sources that
Mr. Bush has access to. Mr. Jones does not like the fact that
Mr.Bush has not made his evidence public. Mr. Bush does not
have to make his evidence public, there are enough people
who have escaped Iraq and gone public with the events that
occurred in Iraq. Where are those people in Mr. Jones's story?
I could go
on and on and on, but I figure by now I must be losing your
attention so I would just like to say that if the story is
a joke it is not funny and does not deserve space on your
web site with all of the other jokes that are deservedly given
space. And if it is a political statement it is poorly thought
out at the very best, and pro-Saddam propaganda at the worst.
I hope you remove it from your site as it does not look very
intelligent on your part. If it does reflect your political
views, why don't you say so? I am sure that many people from
the U.S.A. would like to know if that is what you think of
the President of their country and his policies. I hope you
see that Mr. Terry Jones is an actor and a comedian and as
such is not actually capable of thinking intellectually. Actors
rarely think with any amount of intelligence and they are
not politicians or governmental leaders. I don't think any
of them have any credentials in international politics, although
if I am wrong please correct me. I also hope you know that
personal politics and views rarely help any business succeed
and I would hate to see your web site lose viewers because
it really is one of the best sites on the web. Even if you
do not agree with my personal view of the situation I hope
you take this seriously. Thank you for your time and thank
you for orsm.net.
|
|
|
|
|